Preface

Please note these are questions leading to links we are missing. This is a self run website, which contains more than just scientific reference. This post itself is that which is not presently intended for self promotion; rather the dissertation of theoretical information. It is in-so-far an attempt to connect with, and aid a community which has up until this point proven to keep far too tight a closed door, and insurmountable threshold for acceptance of new information.

Continue Reading

Societal Issues

People wear hardships like a badge of entry; it’s not impressive that you were once homeless. It’s not impressive how hard you were forced to work to afford school. It’s not impressive that you overcame jaded odds.

It is conditioning and the biggest indicator of a broken society.

We group up to ensure others are in agreement because they went through it too, and so many issues are completely ignored because of it. There are no rites of passage. It is our responsibility to allow this to become the truth for future generations.

And then it’s written about, and happily placed into poetry, music, and art as if it’s necessary. As if it is not a money grab having been through it yourself. It is destruction of any possibility for individuality and true freedom for our future.

There is no grand artistic message if you are not yourself enacting all possible outcomes in which you are capable of; and pulling from yourself the ideation to overcome your limits to become something greater than the laziness which is a successful human being.

It is not until all people are proven to be, and treated with equal intent that we can ever obtain a society which is rightfully capable of enjoying such endeavors.

I would like to see banks de-privatized, and placed into a central system; where all bank employees work under a salary cap, with no exponential increase based on position. Nobody should be making money off holding money to the extent at which we have allowed. I would like to see excess profits put towards people in need, and universal income, and healthcare, and education.

I would like to see incentives for living in dilapidated areas such as universal income, and paid for schooling, tax breaks for companies to move back in, tax waivers for those living in such areas, free food.

I would like to see a better regulated housing market, where monopolies are stifled, and corporations are limited in the extent at which they can purchase properties, where we find a way to consume failed projects, and disallow the over-purchasing of land to create likely to fail malls, or unnecessary projects as such things.

It is clear to me now that the public should be in control of not only our space programs, but the discussion of all scientific endeavors; to such an extent that there is to be no information left out, or withheld from the initiative of the human race.

We are not on the correct course. We have NASA proposing sending magnetic fields to mars to make inhabitable when we can’t even fix global warming; let alone control a planets core, which is required to make a planet inhabitable.

This will end in military dominated space, and singular outcomes which are not wholly beneficial.

Continue Reading

A Better Explanation Regarding Riemann/Navier Q

10/24/18 Sorry for the long read. I’ll explain it a little better here:

Think of it all like how light is a combination of sine waves.

That equation is part of a formula. It’s a modular system. Open up the proof tables and check the proof for Riemann to see what I mean. It’s all right there. Basically, I need to also finish the proof to the Navier-Stokes to make this more plausible to people who don’t get it, but I don’t really have the time at the moment or feel like working it out. I will at some point.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J5C2A0XGWX85PTFrR3ulihqyX4u3Smu4ueDDRXma3A4/edit#gid=0

Everything is a matter of wave interactions. We equate all measurements as if we know what 0 is, but there is no actual 0 for measurement of atomic structures, unless nothing were to exist at all. The fact that we even know what 1 is, is a measurement in itself of atomic structures.

That is why an input (in) is required to define 0. Something created what we perceive; regardless of whether we perceive it as not there or there, and that something is a combination of waves (at the micro scale). The true zero for any tangible system in our universe would be placed on the farthest left point of the graph, with no negative numbers being used at all. Zero can be redefined as a ratio (1/2) because of this. That is done to allow us to use negative numbers without stretching and resampling things. It replaces square functions with divisors, and instead allows you to create larger wholes by subdividing; or making room to allow you to fit more into the system just like atomic processes.

It’s very similar to equating the 0 velocity point for something like a rock before it is pushed down a hill. That 0 means something. It’s just not a true 0.

Think of it like this:

Fahrenheit has a 0, which is measure-able only in Fahrenheit. 0°F is equal to -17.78° Celsius. 0° Celsius is equal to 273.15 Kelvin.

That means that we turn the zero point for each measurement scale into an actual number or ratio by there existing another scale outside of it. All objects in this universe are on a scale outside of the exact point in which our universe went from nothing to the big bang. No zero is a zero, but can be defined using ratios.

This means that by creating a scale using the ratio input, you can now measure things like 0 mph over 0 distance, or 0 miles over 0 seconds. It closes the system, by putting it into a fully defined state and allows for measurement of all things.

As soon as we begin to apply this to all formulas (rewrite them), you will find that accuracies will be where we need them to be. This is because, at this stage in our understanding; both universally and atomically, there is no such thing as an at rest state; in its truest form – as a matter of definition, without a definition of what that state is.

Riemann theorized this, but he didn’t seem to understand it fully, or at least he didn’t think to just do away with his perception of what zero was. It’s not his fault that was a long time ago. He thought (and everyone else still does) that we needed to keep zero in the middle. We still sort of do in order to measure things in a way that makes sense for now, but we need to do so with the understanding that all measurements unless the true source (wave) are not ever going to equate to zero, but that there is the possibility that zero itself can be defined for that group function. Ultimately, we might wind up doing away with zero entirely for all but the most extreme scenarios.

Look if you don’t understand it now it might take you a while to get it. It took me a few months to even begin to draw these conclusions, and you have to understand that we got a lot wrong in order to even do so.

Continue Reading

Fundamental Questions About Atomic Structures

10/14/18 Page 19:

In order to better comprehend this subject, please ensure that you are familiar with silicon doping, and consider why such a process is so similar to the combination of cells/vitamins in the body. Please be aware that everything is reliant on electron fields/counts. This is a well known fact.

I have also updated this post with additional proof towards this concept further below, titled; “Connections We Are Missing” 10/20/18. Please see (***) notation for immediate explanation. 10/28/18

What is all this? The second column would be the beginning to cancerous formations. This starts from a fault in orbits, and leads to build up and clutter/combination of cells and orbits, and loss of path for properly functioning cells/build up because the cancerous object is in the path. This is due to loss of limitation on electromagnetic fields, and forced interactions, and too many electrons in one place.

Limiting function can be broken if pushed too far/orbit lost or misappropriated if too much traffic.

Cancer starts in the same way as how Tokamak fusion reactors go wrong.

I have nothing against fusion research at the moment, but if you need to picture what causes cancer, all you need to do is your own research in particle behavior in these reactors. To clearly understand the similarities, know that the fusion reactors we currently use utilize particle collisions, which is horribly inefficient. These collisions are the result of closed circuits and improper shapes. As we have known for some time now, these types of reactors, and forced paths are often too much to keep orbits stable, and particles wind up completely out of their orbits. This is exactly what kind of reaction starts cancer inside of our bodies. I do not in any way mean that these reactors are causing it, but that it is the same description of how the electrons are behaving within cancerous cells.

This is why radiation works. The frequency variance alters the cluttered locations/electrons enough in many instances, but sometimes it is not enough.

The human body is one large closed atomic circuit. Our lungs, and stomachs are our inputs and the foods we break down are the inputs as well which keep atomic structures “fed”. There is no real difference between this and a torus reactor, or any fusion circuit for that matter.

Cancer or other issues begin with one cell losing its ability to function, which affects the cells around it, but it can be fixed, or the broken cell can be dispersed.

Please note that these are all articles proving that cancer is happening because of internal electromagnetics. This is very real. Our cells aren’t smart. They are group functions.

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-tumor-cell-expansion-current-physics.html

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-09-cancer-awakens-metastasizes.html

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-tiny-vortices-driven-magnetic-fields.html

This stemmed from this question:

What if our bodies pull electrons from magnesium and iron or other heavy, or even non-heavy substances when ingested/broken down? Or what if these objects entering our systems at too high or too low an amount affect the internal magnetic forces in our body (I already believe they do, but have to ask the question so you can think about it more), and having too much of it causes cell clustering similar to combinations of basic structures at the beginning of the universe; where the body begins to create structures due to atomic changes?; but also having too little causes lack in needed objects at the atomic level to function properly as well? Where fluctuation can actually be beneficial?

What I am saying is it is possible, and seemingly likely that doing something as simple as rotating magnetics, at specific frequency combinations and levels around cancerous objects may force a reset in the magnetic functions of that cell, or put it into a state that will allow easier dispersal. It may be broken in the first place because of loss of electrons, or objects which keep its magnetic state in tact. I believe it would have better results if done with fields run around the cell and not placing the cell inside of an already generated field.

Some more proof of concept here. Note that electrons produce radiation when put through MRI functions. There is a clear connection to this idea, and the fact that this happens in actual tests. There are many ways this needs to be tested with cancerous formations.

https://physics.aps.org/story/v5/st13

This is why I also believe if we can find a way to safely ionize cells it will help to disperse with high frequency radiation. It might just put it into a state which allows destruction of the cell, or consummation by the others to allow for overall dispersal.

***Essentially what this would do; is create a cellular (magnetic) variation of quantum confinement; in which the rotation of more than 1 external field is used to press on the interior electromagnetic fields of the cells (atomically structured cell walls). This forces the cellular electron field into a state in which it does not normally operate and allows it a chance to “reset” its function. Doing so with proper radiation phasing and interval may help to improve the results, but ultimately we should be able to prove that it is possible to do using magnetics alone. We may also be able to use insertable devices as an addition to the process (electron probes) to extend atomic circuits and improve results.

This is a very similar, and much safer concept as compared to how hyperthermia helps improve cancer treatment.

 

“Ultrafast manipulation of mirror domain walls in a charge density wave”

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/10/eaau5501

“Unstable cosmic domain walls may decay and produce observable radiation.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_wall

“Understanding mNP Hyperthermia for cancer treatment at the cellular scale”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169898/

 

Here is something newly determined effective; which follows the exact principles I have described. The article states that the treatment works because the cancer is “roughed up” by chemo-therapy, allowing for the immune response to help; when in reality, it has affected electron counts, locations, and structure; allowing for the auto-matic; atomic function of the immune system to attach and enact its function. The immune system recognizes what needs to be done based on structures at a far smaller scale than anyone seems to be looking into.

 

https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2018/smd/first-immunotherapy-success-for-triple-negative-breast-cancer.html

 

Magnesium w/ regards to learning disabilities, and path/current appropriation in brain
update 11/9/18: this has now been proven, and linked via zinc
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-autism-zinc-deficiency-early-developmentnow.html
Something to note, I sent this information to the authors (website – phys.org) for this, and it was ignored multiple times, and now they are posting an article about it.

Cancer, igfbp1 + glucose buildup and insulin issues

Think about why electron excitement would lead to skin cancer

Objects that change color from heat

Symmetry of human body, symmetry of dna

Garlic compared to yeast

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/why-remote-colombian-town-hot-spot-inherited-intellectual-disability

Here is pretty much a literal representation of this theory working. There isn’t much else to say after seeing this:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-cell-compressing-technique-path-immunotherapy.html

Update 11/13/18, there is more to say:
pictured below:

To aid in the flow of electrons (we should experiment with electron stints). The overall cell wall can be affected by the flow of the atomic wave format. As can be the entire body.

(pictured) Is like static wave combinations (you will need to understand wave functions in general at the atomic level). Essentially this picture is a basic visualization of cell structures. The overall functions of combinations of any vitamin or cell are that of waves, which you can think of as small vibrations or static. There is no getting around this. It is how atomic structures work. You will need to give in to allowance of this information in order to accept that this will be effective. Again, this is proven. I don’t need to go over it with you.

Anyways, these wave combinations can be more or less determined with the Fourier transforms, though the current format for the formulas are somewhat old and inefficient. I am still getting around to rewriting them. It will take time. I don’t have any specified time to complete that. You don’t need it rewritten to figure this out.

If you don’t understand please contact me to ask, or read explanations on wave functions throughout this site. arisopus@electronmail.com

Cells and vitamins are comprised entirely of waves, as is this entire universe. Cancer is a function of combinations of compatible waves. Where the group will include additional waves when they come into contact due to plausible phase states and frequency variants of the “atom”.

This is due to cancer being the broken combination of possible wave states. The atomic structure is not comprised of separate electrons, but rather a spherical wave state, with specific amplitudes, or more prominent peaks in wave-cycle; as shown in the double slit experiment. What happens with the wave (cell) is that it reaches an over-influenced or over-pushed state (think square wave) because it is pushed up against competing wave forms (cell walls). The wave function allows for sub-division. The subdivision occurs and continues to repeat because our body is a “closed” circuit. There is little else for the wave to propagate to. It is not more complicated than that. The complication comes in safely rectifying the issue.

Additionally we may be able to use structures such as alkalines to target cancer locations with specific immune responses. Timing is also very important when it comes to affecting waves; not just shooting radiation at it. Consider this thought; how do you combat a square wave with sine waves in such a way that it returns the square wave back to a sine state.

Electron probes will be an important part in determining timing of cancerous formations. The electrons are a part of a wave, and all waves have timing and a wave-cycle. This is readable. It’s not just cancerous timings we can find with this either. ***Best timings will always be at the specific points in a wave-cycle.

Here is some tangible proof of these effects at the cellular level, where the timing of division is relative to the excitement of the cell group; and individual cells as a part of the group function where rectification or cell division occurs:


C. Imperial College Of Science, Technology, and Medicine

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189088/cells-decide-when-divide-based-their/?hootPostID=09c3ba413f4d17f29b6c8b78ad5dae01

Some other things to think about

Estradiol – Breast development
Gynecomastia – Chemotherapy can cause it
Please see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/582502
Liver growth/capability for regeneration (main hub for essential wave states (vitamins) – this is extremely important)
Excitement of state in specific areas to promote appropriation of specific structures
B12, magnesium, zinc
Alkaline Phosphatase – carrier/pointer* Comparable to ionization or accumulation of sodium through dehydration
Vitamin D – IGF1 – Calcium
Vitamin D prohibits/slows growth of blood vessels in cancer cells (this is rectification in the direction of Vitamin D).
IGF1 (cell division) (this is rectification in the direction of the cancer cell, or the wave state exceeding the compatibility of surrounding waves – cells sub-divide as do waves when presented with specific phase limitations)
-Also decreases inflammation (stabilizes) in the case of MS, it helps; due to adding of the phase state to the deteriorating cells (rectification through addition of the phase).
Vit D – deficiency causes autism. Excess amounts of Alkalines, or too little will cause autism. There is a clear indication that the appropriate level of current is needed during development.
Stints would be good use for granular type cancers

Update 11/26/18 More new proof that this is feasible:

https://journals.aps.org/prmaterials/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.085006

Light-activated, single-ion catalyst breaks down carbon dioxide:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181126105519.htm

The catalyst article proves without a doubt that this theory had been correct. (Light is a form of radiation)

Regarding conceptions of Mu waves (autism), this understanding is not where it should be. When a mu wave is reduced in state it is because the body is using that current to perform the actions the brain is requesting. Our body is a circuit. It is linked to autism, because the body requires Alkalines to appropriate waves. The lack in cognition of others is because there was at a point a deficit in path, along with perceivable stimuli. Autism will most likely always exist along with other missing connections, because there was not enough of what is needed for circuitry during development. Without the Alkalines, our body is too resistant internally to make some connections. The same may be said with too many. The path is not fully functional, or overcrowded. This is compounded when the body has grown with the deficiency.

One connection which will be helpful towards this struggle would be discussing positive (enjoyed) subjects which are in direct violation of a current action if the action is negative (for the autistic). IE: What you are doing reminds me of food; but you are really upset. Or discussing a negative if the action is positive. This wouldn’t just work with an autistic subject.. Once the person is aware of an action, it can be compounded upon with positive stimuli. This will appropriate clear links or indicators for future reference through the hippocampus. The use of a negative subject is done with a positive action in order to reinforce the autistic connection by putting the mind into a state which causes one to justify their action. It is a state of question and recall for the brain. Through association of food with the act of being upset due to a specific thing, you eventually wind up associating or identifying being upset with the actual act of being upset.

This is improved upon by eventually showing one who is autistic how to apply this process to their own thinking.

 


 

“Separate” “field” – not cancer related

There is nothing special going on here “Beyond Standard Model Particle”:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.09615.pdf

 

People are freaking out over something which just has a great enough difference in frequency to pass through everything. It is probably rectified in our earths core just like things are rectified in the sun, and becomes detectable on its way out. We already understand this type of stuff, and is another example of the entire science community ignoring what’s right in front of them. I don’t know why it is such a mystery to everyone.

“Connections We Are Missing”

Regarding cancer, and electron issues;

It is likely possible to use salt to safely ionize cells before radiation in order to more effectively combat cancerous formations; or at least that we should put such a theory to test. I have no resources to do this myself, or I would be right now. It is important to find natural, or safe ways to affect the atomic wave states in order to better affect success of treatment.

Why do I feel this is something needed? Well for one, our body does not in any way send water molecules to “combat” or “dilute” sodium build up when too much sodium is present; but rather it means we have developed newly ionized objects which water is then bonding to.

Why does this matter? You need to know that when our bodies are dehydrated, we produce sodium. That is true, but its not the full picture. It is not what happens on the atomic level. On the atomic level, we have lost electrons (produced sodium – ionization). This then leads to more water molecules sticking to the newly ionized particle (sodium). It seems the reason our body needs water most is to maintain an electron balance. This is exactly what electrolytes (magnesium is an electrolyte) do; is add more electrons to our body as the structure is broken down.

As water is pulled out of cells they shrink. Remember water is pulled out when the body is dehydrated, because there are sodium structures being generated; due to loss of electrons; which have one outlying electron causing an attraction for additional water molecules from cells. This is a sort of domino effect leading to cell deterioration. This is clearly going to be tied to what needs to be done to combat cancer more effectively. Using salt as a perpetuator before radiation may increase the treatments effectiveness, or at the very least we need to test these kind of things out. Once we know which way it works, we can start trying things out the other way.

11/28/18

Square formats in nature are found due to phase interactions (cancellations) at peak cycle points for atomic structure; ionized interactions – why you find salt in squares. This is also why ionizations tend to lead to either attachment or dispersal of atomic states. Why CO2 can be cleaned.

Continue Reading

Fundamental Questions About Atomic Structures

10/14/18 Page 19:

In order to better comprehend this subject, please ensure that you are familiar with silicon doping, and consider why such a process is so similar to the combination of cells/vitamins in the body. Please be aware that everything is reliant on electron fields/counts. This is a well known fact.

I have also updated this post with additional proof towards this concept further below, titled; “Connections We Are Missing” 10/20/18. Please see (***) notation for immediate explanation. 10/28/18

What is all this? The second column would be the beginning to cancerous formations. This starts from a fault in orbits, and leads to build up and clutter/combination of cells and orbits, and loss of path for properly functioning cells/build up because the cancerous object is in the path. This is due to loss of limitation on electromagnetic fields, and forced interactions, and too many electrons in one place.

Limiting function can be broken if pushed too far/orbit lost or misappropriated if too much traffic.

Cancer starts in the same way as how Tokamak fusion reactors go wrong.

I have nothing against fusion research at the moment, but if you need to picture what causes cancer, all you need to do is your own research in particle behavior in these reactors. To clearly understand the similarities, know that the fusion reactors we currently use utilize particle collisions, which is horribly inefficient. These collisions are the result of closed circuits and improper shapes. As we have known for some time now, these types of reactors, and forced paths are often too much to keep orbits stable, and particles wind up completely out of their orbits. This is exactly what kind of reaction starts cancer inside of our bodies. I do not in any way mean that these reactors are causing it, but that it is the same description of how the electrons are behaving within cancerous cells.

This is why radiation works. The frequency variance alters the cluttered locations/electrons enough in many instances, but sometimes it is not enough.

The human body is one large closed atomic circuit. Our lungs, and stomachs are our inputs and the foods we break down are the inputs as well which keep atomic structures “fed”. There is no real difference between this and a torus reactor, or any fusion circuit for that matter.

Cancer or other issues begin with one cell losing its ability to function, which affects the cells around it, but it can be fixed, or the broken cell can be dispersed.

Please note that these are all articles proving that cancer is happening because of internal electromagnetics. This is very real. Our cells aren’t smart. They are group functions.

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-tumor-cell-expansion-current-physics.html

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-09-cancer-awakens-metastasizes.html

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-tiny-vortices-driven-magnetic-fields.html

This stemmed from this question:

What if our bodies pull electrons from magnesium and iron or other heavy, or even non-heavy substances when ingested/broken down? Or what if these objects entering our systems at too high or too low an amount affect the internal magnetic forces in our body (I already believe they do, but have to ask the question so you can think about it more), and having too much of it causes cell clustering similar to combinations of basic structures at the beginning of the universe; where the body begins to create structures due to atomic changes?; but also having too little causes lack in needed objects at the atomic level to function properly as well? Where fluctuation can actually be beneficial?

What I am saying is it is possible, and seemingly likely that doing something as simple as rotating magnetics, at specific frequency combinations and levels around cancerous objects may force a reset in the magnetic functions of that cell, or put it into a state that will allow easier dispersal. It may be broken in the first place because of loss of electrons, or objects which keep its magnetic state in tact. I believe it would have better results if done with fields run around the cell and not placing the cell inside of an already generated field.

Some more proof of concept here. Note that electrons produce radiation when put through MRI functions. There is a clear connection to this idea, and the fact that this happens in actual tests. There are many ways this needs to be tested with cancerous formations.

https://physics.aps.org/story/v5/st13

This is why I also believe if we can find a way to safely ionize cells it will help to disperse with high frequency radiation. It might just put it into a state which allows destruction of the cell, or consummation by the others to allow for overall dispersal.

***Essentially what this would do; is create a cellular (magnetic) variation of quantum confinement; in which the rotation of more than 1 external field is used to press on the interior electromagnetic fields of the cells (atomically structured cell walls). This forces the cellular electron field into a state in which it does not normally operate and allows it a chance to “reset” its function. Doing so with proper radiation phasing and interval may help to improve the results, but ultimately we should be able to prove that it is possible to do using magnetics alone. We may also be able to use insertable devices as an addition to the process (electron probes) to extend atomic circuits and improve results.

This is a very similar, and much safer concept as compared to how hyperthermia helps improve cancer treatment.

 

“Ultrafast manipulation of mirror domain walls in a charge density wave”

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/10/eaau5501

“Unstable cosmic domain walls may decay and produce observable radiation.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_wall

“Understanding mNP Hyperthermia for cancer treatment at the cellular scale”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169898/

 

Here is something newly determined effective; which follows the exact principles I have described. The article states that the treatment works because the cancer is “roughed up” by chemo-therapy, allowing for the immune response to help; when in reality, it has affected electron counts, locations, and structure; allowing for the auto-matic; atomic function of the immune system to attach and enact its function. The immune system recognizes what needs to be done based on structures at a far smaller scale than anyone seems to be looking into.

 

https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2018/smd/first-immunotherapy-success-for-triple-negative-breast-cancer.html

 

Magnesium w/ regards to learning disabilities, and path/current appropriation in brain
update 11/9/18: this has now been proven, and linked via zinc
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-autism-zinc-deficiency-early-developmentnow.html
Something to note, I sent this information to the authors (website – phys.org) for this, and it was ignored multiple times, and now they are posting an article about it.

Cancer, igfbp1 + glucose buildup and insulin issues

Think about why electron excitement would lead to skin cancer

Objects that change color from heat

Symmetry of human body, symmetry of dna

Garlic compared to yeast

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/why-remote-colombian-town-hot-spot-inherited-intellectual-disability

Here is pretty much a literal representation of this theory working. There isn’t much else to say after seeing this:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-cell-compressing-technique-path-immunotherapy.html

Update 11/13/18, there is more to say:
pictured below:

To aid in the flow of electrons (we should experiment with electron stints). The overall cell wall can be affected by the flow of the atomic wave format. As can be the entire body.

(pictured) Is like static wave combinations (you will need to understand wave functions in general at the atomic level). Essentially this picture is a basic visualization of cell structures. The overall functions of combinations of any vitamin or cell are that of waves, which you can think of as small vibrations or static. There is no getting around this. It is how atomic structures work. You will need to give in to allowance of this information in order to accept that this will be effective. Again, this is proven. I don’t need to go over it with you.

Anyways, these wave combinations can be more or less determined with the Fourier transforms, though the current format for the formulas are somewhat old and inefficient. I am still getting around to rewriting them. It will take time. I don’t have any specified time to complete that. You don’t need it rewritten to figure this out.

If you don’t understand please contact me to ask, or read explanations on wave functions throughout this site. arisopus@electronmail.com

Cells and vitamins are comprised entirely of waves, as is this entire universe. Cancer is a function of combinations of compatible waves. Where the group will include additional waves when they come into contact due to plausible phase states and frequency variants of the “atom”.

This is due to cancer being the broken combination of possible wave states. The atomic structure is not comprised of separate electrons, but rather a spherical wave state, with specific amplitudes, or more prominent peaks in wave-cycle; as shown in the double slit experiment. What happens with the wave (cell) is that it reaches an over-influenced or over-pushed state (think square wave) because it is pushed up against competing wave forms (cell walls). The wave function allows for sub-division. The subdivision occurs and continues to repeat because our body is a “closed” circuit. There is little else for the wave to propagate to. It is not more complicated than that. The complication comes in safely rectifying the issue.

Additionally we may be able to use structures such as alkalines to target cancer locations with specific immune responses. Timing is also very important when it comes to affecting waves; not just shooting radiation at it. Consider this thought; how do you combat a square wave with sine waves in such a way that it returns the square wave back to a sine state.

Electron probes will be an important part in determining timing of cancerous formations. The electrons are a part of a wave, and all waves have timing and a wave-cycle. This is readable. It’s not just cancerous timings we can find with this either. ***Best timings will always be at the specific points in a wave-cycle.

Here is some tangible proof of these effects at the cellular level, where the timing of division is relative to the excitement of the cell group; and individual cells as a part of the group function where rectification or cell division occurs:


C. Imperial College Of Science, Technology, and Medicine

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189088/cells-decide-when-divide-based-their/?hootPostID=09c3ba413f4d17f29b6c8b78ad5dae01

Some other things to think about

Estradiol – Breast development
Gynecomastia – Chemotherapy can cause it
Please see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/582502
Liver growth/capability for regeneration (main hub for essential wave states (vitamins) – this is extremely important)
Excitement of state in specific areas to promote appropriation of specific structures
B12, magnesium, zinc
Alkaline Phosphatase – carrier/pointer* Comparable to ionization or accumulation of sodium through dehydration
Vitamin D – IGF1 – Calcium
Vitamin D prohibits/slows growth of blood vessels in cancer cells (this is rectification in the direction of Vitamin D).
IGF1 (cell division) (this is rectification in the direction of the cancer cell, or the wave state exceeding the compatibility of surrounding waves – cells sub-divide as do waves when presented with specific phase limitations)
-Also decreases inflammation (stabilizes) in the case of MS, it helps; due to adding of the phase state to the deteriorating cells (rectification through addition of the phase).
Vit D – deficiency causes autism. Excess amounts of Alkalines, or too little will cause autism. There is a clear indication that the appropriate level of current is needed during development.
Stints would be good use for granular type cancers

Update 11/26/18 More new proof that this is feasible:

https://journals.aps.org/prmaterials/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.085006

Light-activated, single-ion catalyst breaks down carbon dioxide:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181126105519.htm

The catalyst article proves without a doubt that this theory had been correct. (Light is a form of radiation)

Regarding conceptions of Mu waves (autism), this understanding is not where it should be. When a mu wave is reduced in state it is because the body is using that current to perform the actions the brain is requesting. Our body is a circuit. It is linked to autism, because the body requires Alkalines to appropriate waves. The lack in cognition of others is because there was at a point a deficit in path, along with perceivable stimuli. Autism will most likely always exist along with other missing connections, because there was not enough of what is needed for circuitry during development. Without the Alkalines, our body is too resistant internally to make some connections. The same may be said with too many. The path is not fully functional, or overcrowded. This is compounded when the body has grown with the deficiency.

One connection which will be helpful towards this struggle would be discussing positive (enjoyed) subjects which are in direct violation of a current action if the action is negative (for the autistic). IE: What you are doing reminds me of food; but you are really upset. Or discussing a negative if the action is positive. This wouldn’t just work with an autistic subject.. Once the person is aware of an action, it can be compounded upon with positive stimuli. This will appropriate clear links or indicators for future reference through the hippocampus. The use of a negative subject is done with a positive action in order to reinforce the autistic connection by putting the mind into a state which causes one to justify their action. It is a state of question and recall for the brain. Through association of food with the act of being upset due to a specific thing, you eventually wind up associating or identifying being upset with the actual act of being upset.

This is improved upon by eventually showing one who is autistic how to apply this process to their own thinking.

 


 

“Separate” “field” – not cancer related

There is nothing special going on here “Beyond Standard Model Particle”:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.09615.pdf

 

People are freaking out over something which just has a great enough difference in frequency to pass through everything. It is probably rectified in our earths core just like things are rectified in the sun, and becomes detectable on its way out. We already understand this type of stuff, and is another example of the entire science community ignoring what’s right in front of them. I don’t know why it is such a mystery to everyone.

“Connections We Are Missing”

Regarding cancer, and electron issues;

It is likely possible to use salt to safely ionize cells before radiation in order to more effectively combat cancerous formations; or at least that we should put such a theory to test. I have no resources to do this myself, or I would be right now. It is important to find natural, or safe ways to affect the atomic wave states in order to better affect success of treatment.

Why do I feel this is something needed? Well for one, our body does not in any way send water molecules to “combat” or “dilute” sodium build up when too much sodium is present; but rather it means we have developed newly ionized objects which water is then bonding to.

Why does this matter? You need to know that when our bodies are dehydrated, we produce sodium. That is true, but its not the full picture. It is not what happens on the atomic level. On the atomic level, we have lost electrons (produced sodium – ionization). This then leads to more water molecules sticking to the newly ionized particle (sodium). It seems the reason our body needs water most is to maintain an electron balance. This is exactly what electrolytes (magnesium is an electrolyte) do; is add more electrons to our body as the structure is broken down.

As water is pulled out of cells they shrink. Remember water is pulled out when the body is dehydrated, because there are sodium structures being generated; due to loss of electrons; which have one outlying electron causing an attraction for additional water molecules from cells. This is a sort of domino effect leading to cell deterioration. This is clearly going to be tied to what needs to be done to combat cancer more effectively. Using salt as a perpetuator before radiation may increase the treatments effectiveness, or at the very least we need to test these kind of things out. Once we know which way it works, we can start trying things out the other way.

11/28/18

Square formats in nature are found due to phase interactions (cancellations) at peak cycle points for atomic structure; ionized interactions – why you find salt in squares. This is also why ionizations tend to lead to either attachment or dispersal of atomic states. Why CO2 can be cleaned.

Continue Reading

Burden of Proof

 

0*1267 – (+0*922 + 0*1267(0*345)

= 633.5 – (461 + (((633.5(172.5))/in))) = 258.75

= 258.75 / 1267 *(in / 258.75)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 1267

0*0; – (0*0 + 0*0(0*0)

= .25 – (.25 + (.25(.25);…/.50) = .125

= .125 / 0 *(in / .125)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 0

0*1; – (0*1 + 0*1(0*0)

= .5 – (.5 + (.5(.25);…/1) = .375

= .375 / 1 *(in / .375)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 1

0*2; – (0*1 + 0*2(0*1)

= 1 – (.5 + (1(.5);…/2) = .75

= .75 / 2 *(2 / .75)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 2

0*3; – (0*1 + 0*3(0*2)

= 1.5 – (.5 + (1.5(1);…/3) = -.5

= .5 / 3 *(3 / .5)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 3

0*4; – (0*1 + 0*4(0*3)

= 2 – (.5 + (2(1.5);…/4) = -1.5

= -1.5 / 4 * (4 / -1.5)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 4

0*2761; – (0*1245 + 0*2761(0*1516)

= 1380.5 – (622.5 + (1380.5(758);…/2761) = 378.862731
= 378.862731 / 2761 * (2761 / 378.862731)

= 1 * (( 0 *2761 ) * 2761 )) / ( 0 *2761 ))

= 2761

0*3376547; – (0*1278314 + 0*3376547(0*2098233)

= 1688273.5 – (639157 + (1688273.5(1049116.5);…/3376547) = 524558.25
= 524558.25 / 3376547 * (3376547 / 524558.25)

= 1 * (( 0 *3376547 ) * 3376547 )) / ( 0 *3376547 ))

= 3376547

0*934; – (0*105 + 0*934(0*829)

= 467 – (52.5 + (467(414.5);…/934) = 621.75

= 621.75 / 934 * (934 / 621.75)

= 1 * (( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ))

= 934

Continue Reading

Letter For Science

NP Test and Proof Tables: Spreadsheet
Letter for Science: Document

4th October, 2018 — Dear Reader,

Please refer to attached tables, formulas and proofs as needed throughout this letter. This is an open formula, and one which you may feel free to add to at any point should you feel you are capable of doing so. Please note that although my views are stern, there is in-fact proof. I must ask you to continue reading. If you feel inclined to overlook this paper, please briefly scroll through to see all highlighted points so you may develop an understanding of what you have chosen to ignore.

This is an answer to the Riemann hypothesis (0 = 1/2), and some others. This math is going to be new to you, and will seem unconventional.

Here is an example. I have explained in detail what is going on here below.
0*3376547; – (0*1278314 + 0*3376547(0*2098233)

= 1688273.5 – (639157 + (1688273.5(1049116.5);…/3376547) = 524558.25
= 524558.25 / 3376547 * (3376547 / 524558.25)

= 1 * (( 0 *3376547 ) * 3376547 )) / ( 0 *3376547 ))

= 3376547

( in(0) – (n(0) + [ in(0) *np(0) /in ] /in ) * ( in / [ in(0) – (n(0) + [ in(0) *np(0) /in ]) * [ (( 0 * in ) * in)) / ( 0 * in )) ] – This proof has been tested into the millions and completed.

Dirac delta function: “In mathematics, the Dirac delta function (δ function) is a generalized function or distribution introduced by the physicist Paul Dirac. It is used to model the density of an idealized point mass or point charge as a function equal to zero everywhere except for zero and whose integral over the entire real line is equal to one. As there is no function that has these properties, the computations made by the theoretical physicists appeared to mathematicians as nonsense until the introduction of distributions by Laurent Schwartz to formalize and validate the computations.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function

This formula also directly conflicts with the statement that: “Third Law Of Thermodynamics: “It is impossible for any process, no matter how idealized, to reduce the entropy of a system to its absolute zero value in a finite number of operations”. I literally did that.

More tangible proof of what I am trying to show. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181004110027.htm

The reason this works is because of phase differences, and that is why it doesn’t work so well with these types of objects and light. I have included videos below showing exactly this; done with sine waves.

The videos above are related to the Birch and Swinnerton Q. Here is some more proof of zero definition (Riemann Hypothesis):

Calculated for 12:

Reminder: Please see proof tables

This letter has been written to establish a new, and better response to our universe and the objects interacting within.

The formulas set within are modular, and meant to open your thought to what will become possible using these foundations. The formulas which are being added, are being built off of input functions, and ratios. They are meant for simplicity; and are valued in that it will not require extensive knowledge of multiple different theories to begin to work within of your own accord.

These ideas are being set forth because they are ideas which must be completed by multiple people, as no one person is the key to our universal cognizance. There is to be no discrimination between capabilities. If it works, it works. But find out why.

We will require at some point an open, ongoing discussion in which to more freely share ideas through the use of our internet; which does not rely on the bottleneck of news outlets, or caveat of degrees; which are all built upon information we ourselves have invented. We will require one which does not build upon view statistics, and is open to any individual to add to. This is needed because our mathematical system is broken. It is far too divided and undefined. We have begun to create whole imaginary systems to attempt to define numbers which are perceived as irrational; when in reality, they exist; therefore they are rational. – And we are teaching these ideas as definite answers in our school systems.

One of the larger issues in current math is our use of symbols which have no real definition, or group functions which don’t fully understand the inputs. We are also using roots and squares for systems which are largely circular, and relying on the ratio of one set of numbers (22/7) to define all. For the time being, our perception needs to change to that of; Our world is not built upon 1 single ratio. The universe may be, but our existence is a combination of many, which are a function of the whole.

In order to describe how this all works, I will need to further define the paragraph above. I will do this by walking you through the answer, or proof to the Riemann hypothesis, or as I would prefer to call it; the proof that zeros must in all cases be a defined value. I must do this by also describing to you the answer of the Birch and Swinnerton conjecture, or as I would prefer to call it; Does NP allow for time-independent location discovery? (The ellipses conjecture)

The answer to that second one is yes. You might need to go over the tables now, and even some of the stuff I have been writing about over the past couple of months to fully comprehend why, but I will explain it in reference to the formula. Please keep in mind that some of my past writings include old information or theories which led to this page and were incomplete at the time. I still need to go over those and apply all of this new information to it. This may one day become obsolete.

(( n + in (np) – in ) / np )) ; Where 0 = 0

What does that mean? This is a function which should work, but it does not. Because it does not have an input. If it had an input, it would be adding points together, and then removing the ratio of one or sets of points to determine the maximum distance from the initial point, or the diameter of a circle. You could picture it as reading phase points, or spiraling outwards to read points like one of today’s computers might do so as to become familiar with the idea, but that isn’t exactly it. It is using ratios to determine ratios.

This equation is generating ellipses at the moment (in its presented form), as it always gives an answer which is less than that of the maximum values surrounding it.

It is actually possible to allow a broader function to deflate itself using this set with an input; and/or when in combination with zero definitions by repeating the function until the ratio reaches itself, and then inflate itself through combinations with 0. (generate spheres) – it is more complicated than written though, and matches more of the final equation shown in this letter than the one above. Unfortunately, I chose not to keep that equation when I discovered it, because I didn’t realize its importance until I actually wrote this out. It shouldn’t be too hard for you to find yourself though. It probably needed to be rewritten anyways.

This happens to be one set which will be used throughout the rest of this letter, and some version of it is used so far in almost all of the formulas I have found. This was my start point. Please keep in mind that all of this information appears to be things we know already. I can assure you it is not.

What happens when you add an input?

In – (( n + in (np) – in ) / np )) ; Where 0 = 0

You would expect the answer to come out to the input minus the ratio, but that is not really the case. It is a definition for a path, or ((the start point – (the amount of points remaining, minus the input combined with the amount of points traveled, minus the input of that, divided by the traveled points));

or the input being added, and then immediately being removed with a calculation of new inputs and divisions which are based on the first.

It is a piece to a functional form of feedback capable of generating new points which are based only on ratios in relation to themselves.

This is the biggest hurdle in understanding why this all works, and I still struggle defining it sometimes. What I eventually found was that it was incomplete, and that zero and 1 weren’t working. I also found that you needed to continue feeding back to start to calculate many points; good news I am finding ways to remedy that too. I needed to redefine what zero meant, and I also needed to find a way to create a ceiling. I will go into more detail on this later on in this letter, as it is a function which solves the Birch and Swinnerton conjecture, or as I would prefer to call it; Does NP allow for time-independent location discovery? Now that this has been described, I can describe what I mean by zero having a definition.

Basically Riemann said 0 isn’t 0. It should equal ½, and he was pretty much exactly right. Technically it really doesn’t matter what zero equals as long as it equals something (more on that later too), but in our current context ½ is about the right number to use.

Why did I need to do this? Because first of all, you can’t have an input that is nothing (Not yet, we don’t know enough to do that) – (Also, NP = N; also solvable), if you do have an input from nothing then you have to start making up numbers to create that input. This is why 0 on an XY is equal to infinity. Honestly, I find it to be a huge mistake on our part that we even still see it that way. I think it is only because I never followed math enough until now to care, and I never had it instilled into my head that it absolutely had to be that way.

In other words; you can make things up to solve things, but you have to remember that you made things up and remove them from the formula.

Small offshoot, this has everything to do with our universe right now. We need to get more on track with what we don’t need to make up, but it is required sometimes to go outside of the box.

So is making 0 equal to ½ making something up? Absolutely not. Right now if you look at an XY graph, you see -1, 0, 1. Zero is exactly halfway between -1, and 1. The real zero doesn’t exist so it shouldn’t be on the graph. Zero doesn’t even need to be the center.

For some reason we are stretching everything over to 1 to solve our problems, when all we needed to do was fold the number sequence, or forget that zero exists (remove it from the equation). This also meant rewriting everything, which kinda sucks; but we should have done it much sooner. I’ve added some images to this statement as an attachment to you, or they can be found on my website. The images are using the formula above to show you why it works (with circles), and how beautifully it matches magnetic fields.

My first step towards solving this issue with locating points was to turn 0 into a -0, and a +0, which is basically what we do now when we think we are sliding the graph over to one.

The equation I used was:

(( n + in (np) – in ) / np ) * np) / np)) ; Where 0 = 1/2. 0 is halfway between 1 and -1. There should be a -0 and positive 0.

Reminder: Please see proof tables

This is a determination function, so I could use it to work out limited points to obtain diameters for (0,0), (0,1), (1,1), (2,1), and so on. I stopped very early on because it was clear that it wasn’t the best way to do it. Things were symmetrical, but not creating natural shapes. This is visible in the picture where there is a clear gap between -0, and 0 (actual zero still exists). I did make a mistake in not using an input here for more accurate results, but it technically didn’t matter because I was equating for input = input. Something to note when you do these things yourself, is to always use an input. Luckily this was just a diameter function. I might have never learned of this otherwise.

So what now? I needed the graph to work better, and I needed to also ensure that I could make the limiters output equal its input, without the complications of all the made up stuff we are using right now. I had to find a way to make 0 = 0. You can’t do that right? No you can’t at this exact moment in time, not if 0 actually equals nothing.

So I made 0 equal ½ (.5). This seemed like it was the most reasonable number to use. It was right in-between 1 and -1. Later on I discovered that this means negative numbers aren’t really negative, and that it solved another millenial problem. This will play a very large role in understanding our universe better.

This doesn’t just solve millenial problems by the way.

Once I made 0 equal to ½, I found that I could graph what I expected to be correct out, and it worked fantastically, and symmetrically. There was now little issue defining everything down to 1, but I still struggled with 0 – which was .5. It took a little while longer to figure out. One very nice discovery that came out of this was I could now use 0 to increase numbers by a factor of two, or decrease them by a factor of ½, and I had already found that there were ways to turn evens into odds. These two combinations helped very much.

The equations had now become forms of feedback which could rectify itself. They aren’t just for FFT anymore, which I am getting closer to rewriting, but a part of a much more intricate function.

I had done all of that, but I didn’t even understand it until a few days later. I started looking up more conjectures and found the timing of some new discoveries was perfect for this. Especially the Collatz Conjecture (if n even n -> n/2 & if n odd n -> 3n +1). The only issue I had was that conjecture is using too much undefined information.

What is my obsession with 0’s and 1’s? It is what everything is made up of. Our current formats are using whole group functions that we don’t even have the quantum definitions for yet. I really don’t like that. It needs to be simpler until we understand what exactly it is that we are doing. This is also going to allow us to actually use quantum computers one day. I’m not saying we were wrong in taking this path to the present, but it is time to start removing some of the things we made up to define the groups. We partially understand them now and need to take it further.

I had also started to notice ideas which were turned away from because it didn’t fit what we thought was right, and ideas which were ridiculous because we thought we were right. Even this could one day be broken for something new which we couldn’t discover yet, but could only have discovered with it. It is a very uneasy feeling seeing something work, and thinking; “no that can’t be right.”

 

First Iteration
[in – [(( n + in (np) – in ) / np ); * np)) / np)) *np )) /0 )) *in )) *0)) = ans;] / ((ans)] * (in))] – Where 0 = 1/2. Input equals output – Whole Limiter. No Imaginary Information. Another easier way to understand why it works

 

Proof #1:
( in(0) – (n(0) + [ in(0) *np(0) /in ] /in ) * ( in / [ in(0) – (n(0) + [ in(0) *np(0) /in ]) * [ (( 0 * in ) * in)) / ( 0 * in )) ] – This proof has been tested into the millions and completed.

Can be easier understood as:

input = in; 0*in; – ((0*n + 0*in(0*np))

= in – (n + in(np))

-> new function added; /in

= where does the new function go?: in – (((n + ((in(np);/in)))

= output ; {Hold value} waiting for:

= output of ; /(in) ;

Or in other words:

= output ; {Hold value} … wait for … 0*in – ((0*n + 0*in(0*np))) … wait for … value of new function /in “(in – (((n + ((in(np)/in)))” AKA: (feedback)

= output ; *(in / feedback value) or the output multiplied by (the input divided by the feedback value)

= output now equals 1 – Because it has followed a path that allowed a division by the outcome multiplied by the original input value/feedback value.

= output ; *((0 *in) *in)) / (0 *in))

= Now you have found the original input value – found through separate, non-destructive paths

Proof #2:
Same as the first iteration

What is this doing?: Picture a reservoir system or electrical current circuit. It has two paths, with one input. There is a gate at the end of both paths, and each path is fed different portions of the input.

Once the path which has received a higher portion is filled, all of its excess is then fed into the second path until both are filled, and nothing is allowed past the gate until it has reached the fill point for both.

Then picture the paths being subdivided by the initial input values in such a way that it allows for two paths to fill at the same rate. Each time you multiply by 0, you have a subdivision, because 0 equals 1/2.

This is where things become much more interesting.

First off, simplified doesn’t mean it is more effective. It only does if it has the same path. You can compute the same results with different paths (also one day important for quantum computing).

Sidenote: you can use this for pole reversals

This is all understandable without complex math. It needs to stay that way. The only way it should ever become complex is through combinations of functions; but still overall readable without memorization of a hundred different ideas.

What is this all doing? Well it’s making 0 = 0 on the graph, where 0 = .5. This is the first iteration of a definition of zero. It creates a floor (0), and has a limiting function of a whole number for the input, where it does not get higher than the input.

What do I need to do next? I need to generate a ceiling, or a maximum number allowed to be sent into this function. I do this by creating a ratio. The ratio can be X/Y, where the input is the ratio of ⅔. Now the function is that of a ratio, and there are no numbers being used as a definition, but rather the numbers are defined by the ratio sent into the function. That ratio is further defined by computing it as a combination of 0, and ⅔. This means that the function allows for multiple inputs. What you see in the formula above is a combination of 0, and 1/1.

What does that mean? It means you can add up all the points on a graph, and use their combined ratios, plus a definition for the lowest possible and highest possible point combined with a definition for 0 to locate each position, or each upcoming position relative to the ratio of all other points.

In other words, it is part of a new form of FFT.

It also means that you can combine the ratios of X, Y, and Z to feed them as inputs to calculate all plot points together. (multiple calculations at once).

Why is this more than the millenial questions?

Reminder: Please see proof tables; at this point I would suggest reading some other theory answers I have provided such as the explanation for the double slit (page 17) – no. It’s not entanglement, and it has nothing to do with observation; and an explanation for gravitational lensing (page 18). This is all proven, mathematically; it is not drivel.

If you manage to ignore all of this with this much information at your hands, I’m not sure what to say.

This shows the importance of phase, frequency, and interval relationships in our universe, which I cannot stress enough.

It proves the relationships of point locations (vibrations), and electromagnetism.

It proves that it is not just how strong a magnetic field is, but also its frequency and intervals, along with phase relationships of the objects interacting within, and how those objects then interact with each other. Where objects created within one may interact with others entirely differently than an object created at an outside location.

It removes space-time (singularities) from existence. I believe for good, but can’t discount that we just had the wrong version of it. (I would suggest reading some of my notebook entries if you still disagree at this point)

It removes string theory from existence. I believe for good, but can’t discount that we just had the wrong version of it.

It proves that zero can be any number. All numbers are just ratios relative to another.

It disproves the Hodge conjecture

It will help to solve the three body problem

It disables sampling issues with the Nyquist Theorem (mainly known for sound and digital photography)

It will eventually prove the possibility and help to create perpetual motion outside of atomic structures

It will allow us to map atomic structures

It is a viewport to the universe

It shows that the observation affects you just as much as it affects the observed

It will help redefine PI. Basically, I don’t think PI should exist the way that we see it. PI is kind of like our input ratio. I consider it to be an indeterminate which is being used out of place in the current context.

It will help cure cancer. I had to put this last strictly to keep you from rolling your eyes and going back to what you think you know.

This may sound dramatic, but it will change the way we see the universe, and put emphasis on things we have been ignoring

Some things to always keep in mind when developing your own sets, rules, or functions:

•0 *in ) * in ) Is a simple form for obtaining some answers (ans), but it is not complete due to lack of inputs. This is a helpful shortcut, but not to be relied on for first formulations.

•May be possible to simplify other locations. Note that using phrasing such as “2n” requires a function within the 2 to define. I am working to remove that from previous formulas. Even doing it once turns out to be a complicated mistake to fix.
( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in ) * in )) = .125 / .125 – Can be used to balance/inflate numbers.
( 0 *in ) * in )) / ( 0 *in )) = .5 – Can be used to inflate numbers.

•Do not use a predetermined negative number which is not an output from another function until we understand more about why this works.

•Define all numbers leading up to 10 as an equation. Define additional numbers as needed.

•Don’t stop at 0 = .5 – try many different combinations

•Keep everything a function of combinations of 0’s and 1’s.
This is necessary for improving upon computational language. Please avoid using numbers to the power of anything. There are better ways to write out what needs to be done.

•Please also do not use indeterminate numbers such as Pi.

Sincerely,

E

Continue Reading

NP Time Independent (Point Based) Calculations

The items in this specific post are old iterations, and some of these formulas are obsolete. This has been left here for reference purposes. Please see Letter for Science and/or notebook for more recent formulas or ideas.

Stationary Ellipses (Limiter/Maximum)

(n + in(np) – in) / np

 

Calculating 3 Points (Reverse/Exact Point)

-in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2

 

Calculating The 4th Point (Reverse/Exact Point):

 -in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2)
——————————————– 
( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np ); * (n(np))

 

Or (denominator):

 

(( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np ))

* (n(np))

 

Please note this equation pulls from itself. The final calculation is the answer of the bottom line (denominator) multiplied by N(NP); where say the answer comes to .1333333, it is then brought up to its whole number by multiplying it through a factor of (n(np).

Legend:

N = Point 2 (b) Traveled From 0 Axis
IN = Total Distance Traveled From First And Last Point
NP = New Point Distance (Final) From First Point

 

( n + in (np) – in ) / np
Stationary Ellipses (Limiter/Maximum)
Determination
-in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2
Calculating 3 Points (Reverse/Exact Point)
Lookup
(( -in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2)) / (( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np ); * (n(np))
Calculating 4th Point (Reverse/Exact Point)
Lookup
ip + in (np) – in / np equals 0 – Incomplete
n + (np-2n) FFT rewrite – Incomplete Determination
(( n + np (in) – in) / np ) *2) * 2in + ( -2n + np )) * 1/3 needs compressor Alteration
* 1/3
0.85174
Turning 7 into 6: 2in + ( -2n + np )) and /np Balancing
(( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np )) * (1 1/3) – 2) / 6
(((( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np )) /np + ( -n + np ))) *2) * 3 * 2 * 10
(( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np ))
(( -in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2)) / (( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np )* (n(np)) broken
(( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np )) / ((-in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2in – n)) broken
-in + ( n + np (in) – in) / np * 2in – n ( n + np (in) – in) / np ) * 2in + ( -2n + np )) broken

 

Examples of currently working point combinations:

 

Continue Reading